Posts Tagged ‘silo’

Break Down Internal Barriers

Tuesday, May 5th, 2009

Within larger organisations one of the biggest obstacles to innovation is poor internal communication. A ‘silo’ mentality develops so that departments guard information and ideas rather than share them. People work hard – but in isolated groups. Internal politics can compound the problem with rivalry and turf wars obstructing collaboration. It can reach the ridiculous stage where the enemy is seen as another department inside rather than the competitors outside.



The leader has to tear down the internal fences, punish internal politics and reward co-operation. This sometimes calls for drastic or innovative actions.

Nokia has an informal rule that no-one should eat lunch at their desk or go out for lunch. People are encouraged to eat in the subsidised cafeterias and to mix with people from outside their department. They have found that the informal meetings across departments are beneficial in sharing ideas and understanding. Every organization has to find ways to promote internal communication and collaboration and to fight internal division and competition. Here are some ideas for breaking down barriers to communication:

  • Publish everyone’s objectives and activities on the intranet so that people know what other people are working on.
  • Organise cross-functional teams for all sorts of projects. Make them as loose or as formal as you see fit but be sure that there is good mixing and that all the departments involved contribute.
  • Arrange plenty of social and extra-curricular activities e.g. sports, quizzes, book clubs, hobby clubs, special interest groups etc.
  • Have innovation contests where cross-functional teams compete.
  • Have frequent secondments between departments.
  • Deliberately rearrange the office layout from time to time so that people move desks and sit with new groups (or adopt a hot desk approach).
  • Organise a cross-functional innovation incubator.
  • Encourage department managers to look for ideas, input and solutions from outside their departments. Publicly praise managers who do this.

It is natural for departments in organisations to become more insular. As the organisation grows, good internal communication becomes more and more difficult. There was a saying in Hewlett Packard – ‘If only HP knew what HP knows!’ Very often the knowledge and skills needed to solve your problem exist elsewhere in the company. Knowledge sharing and collaboration are essential for innovation success. A key responsibility of the innovative leader is to constantly fight the silting up of the internal communications and to force contact and sharing between departments.

  • Share/Bookmark

Creating a Culture of Innovation

Friday, November 14th, 2008

What are the key characteristics of a corporate culture that promotes innovation?  And those that inhibit innovation?  These were the topics we discussed in a workshop I facilitated yesterday for the Global Business Partnership Alliance.  We discussed a number of issues.  We conducted a survey among attendees and these were the main issues in the order in which they were a challenge.  The first item was agreed to be the biggest problem in setting a culture for innovation and so on:

  1. Internal communication – overcoming silos.
  2. Allowing failure and eliminating a blame culture.
  3. Allowing anyone to challenge anything.
  4. Developing a positive attitude to change – overcoming fear and complacency.
  5. Developing a positive attitude to risk management.
  6. Empowering people to try new initiatives without explicit approval.
  7. Welcoming ideas from outside the organisation – eliminating ‘not invented here.’
  8. Encouraging new ideas.

We discussed what various companies did to tackle these problems and generated some novel ideas.  One of the most radical was the idea of a ‘Shadow Board’ which would get the same input and agenda as the main board.  It would come to its own conclusions and could then challenge the thinking of the executive team on strategic issues.  In a constructive way it would become the ‘Official Opposition’ and so legitimise a positive debate within the organisation.

If you have any thoughts on this notion or the list above then please add your comments.

Paul Sloane

  • Share/Bookmark