Posts Tagged ‘break’

The ‘Break the Rules’ Exercise

Monday, February 1st, 2010

Innovators are rule breakers.  We often see how new entrants to a market break the rules to which that the existing players conform.  The low cost airlines did this when they challenged the ways in which the major airlines did business.  The new players used electronic tickets, bypassed travel agents, did away with allocated seating, flew to new smaller airports and so on. 

Break the Rules is a workshop method that I use to challenge the fundamental assumptions of your business.  It can be used to illustrate the number and level of restrictions on how you work.  It can also be the basis for new ideas.

Divide into teams of 6 to 8 people.  Each team must list as many rules as they can think of that apply in the organization.  They should spend say 30 minutes capturing as many rules as possible – both obvious explicit rules and the unwritten, implicit rules – ‘the way we do things around here.’   What do you always do?  What do you never do?  What rules apply to hiring, to firing, to people, to finance, to approvals, to customers, to competitors etc.  Typically groups find anywhere from 60 to 100 rules. When you have a long list of rules you then deliberately challenge each of them in turn. For each rule you ask the question – ‘Can we break this rule for the benefit of the business?’  You can use the broken rules as springboards for new ideas.

Say for example you were looking for ways to improve the productivity of a telemarketing department.  Here are some of the rules that you might list as applying to the business today:

  1. We use the telephone
  2. We call between 9 a.m. and 12 and 2 p.m. and 5 p.m.
  3. We are always polite and professional.
  4. We use a script which has been carefully developed to deliver the right messages.
  5. We reward our agents for the number of leads they generate.
  6. We follow-up each appointment with a confirmation letter and information pack.

 Now we break the rules:

  1. We will use other methods of contacting people than the telephone
  2. We will contact people outside normal business hours e.g. early in the morning, at lunch time or in the evening.
  3. We will be rude and unprofessional.
  4. We will let our agents say whatever they want.
  5. We will fine our agents for every lead they get.
  6. We will not send out a confirmation by post.

How can any of these ideas help us to make the department more effective?  Items 1 to 3 might suggest that we find creative ways to approach our target prospects as they arrive at or leave work.  The telemarketing team could dress up as clowns and approach commuters getting off trains with humorous and outrageous messages which solicit responses.  Item 4. might prompt us to think of ways in which we could make our message more interesting and less mechanical.  The idea of fines might prompt us to emphasize to potential customers the costs and penalties from not responding.  Finally item 6 might lead to the ideas of confirming appointments through a special website or hand-delivering to customers a package containing an attractive wall calendar with the date and time of our appointment highlighted.

When I facilitate this exercise in my workshops I often find that teams decide that they can break some 40% to 50% of the rules beneficially.  They are surprised at how many self-imposed limits are holding them back.

Paul Sloane

  • Share/Bookmark

Thinking the Unthinkable

Wednesday, July 2nd, 2008

We can broadly simplify innovations into two kinds – incremental and radical.  Incremental innovations are improvements to current products, methods, processes, services, partnerships and so on.  Customer complaints and suggestions are a good source of ideas for incremental improvements.  So are the people who work in the organisation.  If you ask customers how your product could be better or if you ask employees how their job could made easier they will come up with plenty of proposals.  Most organisations are good at incremental innovation – they make things better.  However, very few organisations are good at radical innovations.  As Gary Hamel puts it – businesses are good at getting better but poor at getting different.  Indeed Clayton Christenson in his book, The Innovator’s Dilemma, argues that it is very difficult for successful organisations to develop disruptive innovations that would threaten the basis of their success.  Often they are put out of business when some smaller company develops a radically new technology.  Which employee working in a booming telecoms company in the 1990s would have suggested that free voice over internet telephony would be something they should develop?  It took a start-up, Skype, to make a success of this radical idea.

How can you encourage your people to countenance drastic innovations?  One way is to run creativity sessions where the objective is to conceive them.  Ask the question, ‘Who killed our business?’  Get small teams to imagine entirely new business models that could deliver the benefits that your customers want.  Each team has to present a scenario of a force so powerful that it could completely replace you.  Starting with a blank piece of paper and none of the encumbrances that limit your organisation they design a super competitor.  They are encouraged to go to extremes and to think completely outside the current model.  The exercise is stimulating and can be very revealing.

Most organisations have natural defence mechanisms against disruptive or threatening ideas.  People immediately find reasons why they should not be considered.  It is difficult to change the culture to one where such ideas are not only heard but are actively encouraged and developed.  The ’Who killed our business?’ exercise is a good way to start.

Paul Sloane

  • Share/Bookmark