Archive for March, 2007

Springwise - spotting innovation in action

Saturday, March 31st, 2007

If you get chance take a look at Springwise.  It has a network of 8000 ’spotters’ who are on the look out for innovative business initiatives.

Here are some recent ones on the site.  Take a look and see if it gives you some great ideas.

Online exchange for parking spaces

Peasy.com is an online marketplace for parking spaces, enabling drivers to search for and book spaces before they leave home, and letting homeowners monetize unused parking spaces.
www.springwise.com/weekly/2007-03-28.htm#peasy

Sightseeing guided by GPS

The GoCar is a tiny yellow two-seater that talks to its passengers,
showing them the sites and providing running commentary, and never losing its way.
www.springwise.com/weekly/2007-03-28.htm#gps

Customized lingerie

When Jenny Dombroski spotted the NikeID website where consumers can customize sneakers according to their preferences, she knew it was a concept that could work for lingerie, too.
www.springwise.com/weekly/2007-03-28.htm#evolve

Paul Sloane

Adopt, Adapt Improve

Sunday, March 25th, 2007

Adapting ideas that have worked in one environment and using them in another is one of the most successful of innovation techniques.  Let’s look at some examples. In 1916 a young American scientist and inventor called Clarence Birdseye went to Canada as a fur trader.  He noticed that people in Labrador kept their food frozen in the snow for extended periods in the winter.  When he returned to the USA he developed this idea and launched a line of quick-frozen foods and persuaded retailers to stock them in freezers.  He created the frozen food industry.  Birdseye subsequently sold his business to General Foods Corporation and made his fortune.  He saw a good idea, adapted it to his business environment and implemented it. Alexander Graham Bell studied the workings of the human ear.  He adapted the idea of the eardrum vibrating with sounds into the workings of a metal diaphragm which led to his invention of the telephone.

The motto of the Round Table is adopt, adapt, improve and it is an excellent guideline for implementing new ideas in your business.  Taking ideas from other environments and adapting them for use in your situation is one of the best ways of implementing novel solutions.  Amar Bhide of the Harvard Business School studied the origin and evolution of new businesses.  He found that over 70% of successful start-ups were based on ideas that the founders had adopted from their previous employments.  They took a promising idea in a field they understood and made it better.

The person who invented the roll-on deodorant was looking for a new way to apply a liquid.  He copied an idea from another field, writing, where the same problem is solved.  He adapted the concept of the ballpoint pen to create the roll-on deodorant.

Samuel Morse was the inventor of morse code.  He encountered a problem sending signals over long distances on the telegraph - the signal became attenuated and weak.  Then one day when he was travelling by stagecoach he noticed how the coach changed horses at relay stations.   He adapted this idea to put in relay stations for telegraphs that boosted the signal.

In 1941 George de Mestral went for a walk with his dog in the Jura mountains in Switzerland.  On their return he noticed that many plant burrs were attached to his trousers and to the dog’s coat.  They were hard to remove.  He examined them under the microscope and saw that they contained tiny hooks that caught in the loops of his clothes and in the dog’s hair.  He developed an artificial material to mimic nature and in doing so he invented Velcro.

Tips for finding ideas you can adopt and adapt:

  • Deliberately gather inputs from unrelated settings. 
  • Take time out to discuss your problem with people from entirely different backgrounds.  If you are a businessman then ask a teacher or a priest or a musician. 
  • Read a different magazine, visit a different environment, see a foreign movie, drive a new route home, find some new inspiration in a different source. 
  • Place yourself in a different environment and it will help you see concepts and ideas you can adapt.  If you visit an Eskimo in his igloo, like Clarence Birdseye, you may come back with an idea as good as the one that built the frozen food industry.
  • Identify analogous situations in other fields and ask how they would be handled.

 Paul Sloane

Are we receptive to ideas or do we just think we are?

Friday, March 16th, 2007

We carried out a survey over the internet in 2006 and early 2007 to assess attitudes towards receptiveness to new ideas within organizations. There were 203 respondents of whom 82% were from private sector companies and 18% from the public sector.

The results indicate that most people consider themselves to be much more receptive to new ideas than their bosses are. So whereas 95% of people think that they would welcome or consider ideas from outside their department, only 77% thought that their manager would.

If they had implemented a new policy and someone suggested there might be a better way to do the whole thing, then 52% of respondents would consider the suggestion carefully and be prepared to try it. However they thought that under similar circumstances only 18% of bosses would do the same. Similarly when it comes to implementing other people’s ideas, 94% of respondents said they would give the credit to the person who came up with the idea. But only 73% thought their boss would do so – 27% thought the boss would claim the credit.

When faced with a difficult problem for some time respondents believed that they were more likely to look outside their department for ideas (43%) than their managers were (24%). They thought that the managers were more likely to ask the department to make more suggestions or to try some more of their own ideas. The most common things that were seen to be preventing new ideas from being adopted there were lack of time and money, poor communication and a variety of cultural issues including risk aversion and fear of failure. A picture of poor leadership in this area emerges. Overall people see their managers as being less open to new ideas than they are. This begs the question – do people become less receptive as they move up the management chain or is it a perception issue? Do we view ourselves as more receptive than we really are? Are we just as bad as our bosses but we don’t see it?

There is a comment on the survey on Chuck Frey’s blog.

You can also view the full report.

Check your Innovation Index

Friday, March 9th, 2007

If you would like a quick assessment of the creativity and innovation capability of your organisation then please try this quick questionnaire.

The average score from past respondents is 22. Please let me know how you score and any comments.

It is designed for organisations that employ more than a just a few people. So if you are in a very small company or you work alone, ask yourself this one searching question:

What truly innovative thing have you done in the past three months?

If the answer is ‘not much’ then you know that you need to sharpen up your act. After all the main advantage of being small is that you can be agile and innovative.

Paul Sloane

What is the Government’s role in innovation?

Wednesday, March 7th, 2007

I was at a business breakfast today organised by Editorial Intelligence, NESTA, Friends Provident and Reuters. The topic was ‘Where is Britain’s innovative edge?’ There were some lively contributors and one of the questions that arose was - what role does the government have to play in encouraging innovation and how well is it doing?

Can government really help? Or should it just get out of the way?

Some people spoke positively in terms of increased government spending on science and Universities and there was praise for the work of Lord Sainsbury. However there was a litany of complaints. These included:

  1. Engineering and science undergraduates need remedial Maths on entering University because of dropping standards at schools. Chinese students arriving at our Universities have no such deficiencies.
  2. Physics teaching is in crisis and some Physics and Chemistry departments have closed. These are now seen as ‘difficult’ subjects by students.
  3. The government does not support or understand small businesses. The DTI is ineffective at delivering grants in the right places without serious complexity.
  4. There have been recent cuts for the Research Councils.
  5. There is a loss of confidence and commitment to large scale projects - e.g. no new power stations or roads, no crossrail link in London, no innovations in transport (except maybe Ken’s access tax).
  6. The public sector is risk averse and constrained by regulation, central dictat and targets.
  7. The planning system impedes major new projects.
  8. The Gershon report pointed out the need for innovation but little has happened since.
  9. Money is wasted on regional ‘innovation strategy’ groups who talk a lot but deliver little.

Has New Labour helped or hindered our innovation efforts? The weight of opinion at this conference came down heavily on the negative side.

regards

Paul Sloane